percentage of people who are pro insider trading legalization

Legalizing euthanasia and assisted suicide therefore places many people at risk, affects the values of society over time, and does not provide controls and safeguards.Įuthanasia is generally defined as the act, undertaken only by a physician, that intentionally ends the life of a person at his or her request 1, 2. In the Netherlands, euthanasia for anyone over the age of 70 who is “tired of living” is now being considered. A terminal illness is no longer a prerequisite. Although the initial intent was to limit euthanasia and assisted suicide to a last-resort option for a very small number of terminally ill people, some jurisdictions now extend the practice to newborns, children, and people with dementia. Increased tolerance of transgressions in societies with such laws represents a social “slippery slope,” as do changes to the laws and criteria that followed legalization. For example, about 900 people annually are administered lethal substances without having given explicit consent, and in one jurisdiction, almost 50% of cases of euthanasia are not reported. The present paper provides evidence that these laws and safeguards are regularly ignored and transgressed in all the jurisdictions and that transgressions are not prosecuted. Prevention measures have included, among others, explicit consent by the person requesting euthanasia, mandatory reporting of all cases, administration only by physicians (with the exception of Switzerland), and consultation by a second physician. In all jurisdictions, laws and safeguards were put in place to prevent abuse and misuse of these practices. Euthanasia or assisted suicide-and sometimes both-have been legalized in a small number of countries and states.

Percentage of people who are pro insider trading legalization